The Final Gay – Homophobic Horror

Carol Clover’s ‘final girl’ theory insists that in the ‘Horror’ film sub-genre, the ‘Slasher’ film, the audience, both male and female, is structurally forced to identify with the female character labelled ‘the final girl’, who survives the killer’s onslaught, often by slaughtering him herself. I propose that ‘the final girl’ is female in physicality only, and her identity is that of a male whose heterosexuality is threatened and in danger of being converted by the symbolically non-heterosexual killer.

Fears of the non-heterosexual have permeated horrific tales through the ages, from the cross-dressing wolf of Little Red Riding Hood (Perrault, 1697) to the monstrous progeny of Frankenstein’s (Colin Clive) and Pretorius’ (Ernst Thesiger) homosexual union in The Bride of Frankenstein (dir. Whale, 1934). These are early examples in film and literature, but the direct roots of the ‘Slasher’ can be traced back to the films of Alfred Hitchcock. The depiction of the non-heterosexual male as subversive, wicked and deranged, permeates Hitchcock’s films much as it did American society at the time. Rope (dir. Hitchcock, 1948) sees a homosexual couple, based upon real life homosexual killers, Leopold and Loeb, commit murder for sport. Strangers on a Train (dir, Hitchcock, 1951) initiates many staples of the ‘Slasher’ sub-genre, such as the shadowy killer who stalks and attacks a young girl in a suburban setting. Also, through the film’s killer, Bruno (Robert Walker), Strangers incorporates many of society’s views on homosexuals, views that can be drawn from viewing ‘educational’ films such as Boys Beware (dir. Davis, 1961). Boys Beware depicts homosexuality as a contagious disease of the mind and homosexuals, although outwardly normal, as murderous, masked predators who target young boys. The film describes conversing with a homosexual as “riding in the shadow of death”, which could easily be the tagline for a ‘Slasher’ film. Further views from the era on the nature of homosexuals can be gained from reading Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals (Bieber, et al., 1962), considered at the time the definitive text on homosexuality.

“The specific findings of Homosexuality (in Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals) concerned three broad areas: mother-son relationships, father-son relationships, and developmental patterns. A significantly greater proportion of homosexuals had ‘close-binding-intimate mothers’ who were seductive to their sons and also over-controlling and inhibiting. A significantly higher proportion of homosexuals also reported having detached, hostile, or rejecting fathers whom they hated or feared during their childhoods”. “It was also found that boys who grew up to be homosexual fit the stereotype of the sissy.” (Lewes, 1988, p.184).

Many comparisons can be drawn between these depictions of homosexuals and Bruno and his relationship with Guy. Bruno, although ostensibly erudite and charming, is mentally deranged. He is camp, effeminate – enjoying having his nails manicured – adoring of his overly protective mother (Marion Lorne) and has an indignant hatred for his distant father (Jonathan Hale). The older Bruno instigates a flirtatious seduction of the boyish Guy (Farley Granger). Granger also played Philip Morgan, one of the two homosexual murderers in Rope, who is subjugated by his partner; a precursor to his role as the victimised Guy. It is indicative of Hitchcock’s view of the character of Guy, as a victim of a homosexual aggressor, that he would select Granger to play him. Bruno’s homosexual coaxing escalates into predatory stalking, in an attempt to seduce Guy into the ways of the killer. Bruno’s characterisation and actions mirror those of society’s perception of the homosexual, with his status as a killer symbolic of his homosexuality and the act of murder as a metaphor for homosexual intercourse. Guy’s role in the narrative can be seen as a prototype for the ‘final girl’, with all future ‘final girls’ adopting his position as a male whose heterosexuality is under threat from a non-heterosexual antagonist.

Hitchcock’s depiction of the non-heterosexual killer continued in Psycho (dir. Hithcock, 1960), a film that with its knife-wielding costumed killer, and gruesome, periodic murderous attacks, helped set the template for all subsequent ‘Slasher’ films. The film would see the character of the homicidally deranged, homosexual mummy’s boy, glimpsed at in Strangers on a Train, taken to the extreme with the character of Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins). Norman, whose upbringing could be drawn straight from the pages of ‘A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals, would help set the template for all subsequent ‘Slasher’ film killers. His father died when he was a child, removing his male role model and leaving him to develop an intimate relationship with his domineering, matriarchal mother. Norman secretly poisoned and killed his mother and her newfound lover. The murder took place while they were in bed, implying recent sexual interaction. This is not only indicative of Norman’s jealous attachment to his mother but also his fear and disgust of heterosexual love. ‘Slasher’ film killers’ aversion to heterosexual love would continue in future films, with killers frequently carrying out murders of young heterosexual couples embroiled in sexual encounters.

The murder of his mother irrevocably warps the young Norman’s mind, transforming him into a gender-bending sociopath, who dresses as and takes on the persona of his mother to carry out his brutal murders. Norman’s ‘mother’ persona is a personification of his homosexuality, a disease that eats at Norman’s mind, one that must be fought and repressed if Norman is to find normality and redemption. The Psycho sequels take a greater focus on Norman’s redemption, as he seeks normality through heterosexual relationships and finally marriage, with the shadow of his deviant, cross-dressing alter-ego perpetually hanging over him. Much like Bruno and the homosexual murderers of ‘Boys Beware’, Norman successfully hides in plain sight, lulling his victims into a false sense of security. When the shy ‘boy next door’ side of Norman’s persona becomes heterosexually aroused, Norman’s mother persona emerges, rebuking and terminating his heterosexual feelings. By adopting his mother persona, Norman is symbolically castrated, reflecting society’s view of the homosexual as less than a man; a sissy. For Norman, killing is an outlet for his sexual inadequacy; the phallic knife penetrating the flesh in an unnatural manner, acting as a grim substitute for the sexual act, reflecting society’s view of the perverseness of homosexual intercourse.

By the mid-seventies, attitudes towards homosexuality and transsexuals had improved. Despite this, a new generation of filmmakers emerged, highly influenced by Hitchcock and raised in an era where non-heterosexuals were treated as an ever-present danger, initiating a golden-age of ‘Slasher’ films. Dressed to Kill (dir. De-Palma, 1980) is a ‘Slasher’ film highly influenced by Hitchcock. As in Psycho, the film features a murder in a shower, a blonde (implied to be the leading lady) being killed off early on, and a cross-dressing killer. Transvestism is again depicted as a dangerous psychosis, with Bobbi (Michael Caine), the killer’s ‘female’ side, killing whenever Robert, his ‘male’ side, is heterosexually aroused. Other ‘Slasher’ films, such as The Silence of the Lambs (dir. Demme, 1991) and Sleepaway Camp (dir. Hiltzik, 1983), continue these negative representations of transvestites. The Silence of the Lambs’ killer, Buffalo Bill (Ted Levine), skins his victims to create a female skin suit, and Angela (Felissa Rose), Sleepaway Camp’s killer, is driven insane by her adoptive parent forcing her to live her life as a girl.

A seminal film crucial to the emergence of this new era of ‘Slasher’ films is The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (dir, Hooper, 1974). The film features a group of young people who set out on a road trip and fall afoul of a perverse cannibalistic family. Like Norman, the family’s perverse desecration of the body is symbolic of their carnal homosexual depravity, which writer Kim Henkel concedes by acknowledging his inspiration for the film:

“The character that influenced the script was a guy named Elmoor Wayne Henley. Elmoor Wayne was the procurer for an older man. Elmoor Wayne would lure young men to the ‘ghouls kitchen’ so to speak, and the older man and Elmoor Wayne would have sexual relations with these young men, and then the young men would be murdered.” (Kim Henkel, 2008).

Also, like Norman they are a product of a perverted upbringing (their grandfather instigating their cannibalistic tendencies) and the corruptive influence of the matriarch. The family hold their Great Grandmother in great reverence, in The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (dir, Hooper, 1986) her corpse is placed in a shrine made of human bones. Worship of the matriarch would continue in future ‘Slasher’ films, such as Friday the 13th Part 2 (dir. Miner, 1981), in which the killer, Jason (Warrington Gillette), constructs a shrine for his mother’s decapitated head. To compensate for the death of Great Grandmother, the character of Leatherface (Gunnar Hansen) has taken on her role. Like Norman, Leatherface is transsexual, and his transvestism is presented as a deranged sickness and the product of a scarred childhood. Leatherface wears a wig and a mask of human flesh adorned with make-up, has a high-pitched voice, and with his rotund figure and apron, like Red Riding Hood’s Wolf, he becomes a gross parody of the grandmother figure. In Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation (dir. Henkel, 1995), Leatherface’s transvestism becomes blatant. Leatherface (Robert Jacks) applies lipstick and nail polish, dons a black dress, pearl earrings and a necklace, and his masks are stated to be made solely from female victims, from which he also fashions fake breasts.

In Chainsaw Massacre 2, Leatherface instigates a relationship with Stretch (Caroline Williams), the final girl, which like Bruno and Guy’s relationship, can be viewed as a homosexual seduction. Leatherface corners Stretch, about to impale her with his phallic chainsaw. In desperation, Stretch acts flirtatiously towards him, and his sexual gratification acts as a substitute for the kill. Later, when Stretch infiltrates the family’s lair, Leatherface conceals her from the rest of the family and attempts to further their romantic involvement. In distaste for her physical form, Leatherface places a mask of flesh upon her, made from ‘male’ skin, and they dance romantically. Like Bruno’s seduction of Guy, Leatherface is converting the symbolically male Stretch to his perverse homosexual lifestyle. At the film’s climax, Stretch is pursued by Chop-Top (Bill Moseley) to Great Grandmother’s shrine and the conversion instigated by Leatherface reaches fruition. Defensively, Stretch bites Chop-Top, unleashing her carnal depravity. Stretch takes a chainsaw from the dead hands of Great Grandmother, symbolically accepting the corruptive influence of the matriarch. She skewers Chop-Top with the symbolically phallic chainsaw, the kill again used as a metaphor for homosexual intercourse. Stretch proceeds to whirl her chainsaw in a fit of insanity, directly paralleling Leatherface’s actions at the end of the first film, symbolising she has become like him; a sexual deviant.

Halloween’s (dir. Carpenter, 1978) Michael Myers (Nick Castle, Jr.) is another killer with strong roots in the films of Hitchcock, confirming his position as another homosexual tormentor. Like Norman, Michael had a traumatic childhood and killed a family member due to distaste for heterosexual sex, having murdered his sister (Sandy Johnson), at age six, after discovering her in bed with her boyfriend (David Kyle). Like Bruno, Michael is a predatory figure, watching from the shadows, stalking his victims through a suburban setting. Another acknowledgement of the influence of Hitchcock is the casting of Laurie (Jamie Lee Curtis), the ‘final girl’, who’s played by the daughter of Psycho star, Janet Leigh. An indication that Laurie, like Stretch, is symbolically male is her androgynous appearance. She shares this trait with other ‘final girl’s’, such as Stretch and Silence of the Lambs’ Clarice (Jodie Foster), who all have short hair and wear masculine clothing, such as shorts, trousers, and suits. Questioned on whether his film punished female sexuality, director John Carpenter had this to say:

“They (the critics) completely missed the boat there, I think. Because if you turn it around, the one girl who is the most sexually uptight just keeps stabbing the guy with a long knife. She’s the most sexually frustrated. She’s the one that killed him. Not because she’s a virgin, but because all that repressed energy starts coming out. She uses all those phallic symbols on the guy… She and the killer have a certain link…sexual repression.” (Clover, 1992, P.48-49).

Carpenter acknowledges the sexual repression of both the killer and the ‘final girl’, and also the phallic symbolism of the weapon. Crucially, the final girl’s association with the phallic symbol reveals her symbolic manhood.

But if the ‘final girl’ is representative of a male, why is she played by a female? A film that breaks from this convention is A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge (dir, Sholder, 1985). Revenge sees the traditional position held by the ‘final girl’ assumed by a male, namely, Jesse (Mark Patton), and the themes of non-heterosexual fear are made manifest. Jesse has nightmares of being a misfit and being uncomfortable with girls. This shows that Jesse, like past ‘final girls’, is socially awkward, and sexually anxious and resistant. Jesse’s social awkwardness is also visible in reality, as depicted in several embarrassing incidents involving Grady (Robert Rusier), including Grady pulling Jesse’s gym shorts down in front of his classmates. This is the beginning of a relationship between the two boys with patent sexual undercurrents. Grady refers to Jesse as a “pretty boy”, the couple discuss wet dreams, and a sexually fuelled row erupts when Jesse snaps at Grady when he asks him out to the movies. Like past killers, Freddy Krueger (Robert Englund) takes on the role of homosexual aggressor and tempter. Freddy visits Jesse in his nightmares in an attempt to seduce him and enter his body so he can wreak havoc in the real world; the possession of Jesse’s body clearly acting as a metaphor for homosexual intercourse. The sexual nature of the relationship is made apparent via Freddy’s flirtatious actions and dialogue, as he is seen to stroke Jesse’s face and declare, “I need you Jesse”.

“Freddy Krueger seems to exist solely in order to work the frightening generic and social connections between horror and homosexuality.” (Benshof, 1997, P.246).

Revenge’s depiction of homosexuality is evidently in-line with the dated opinions of Boys Beware, with homosexuality presented as an evil temptation that Jesse must resist, an abhorrent contagion that can be passed on by an elder aggressor. The film’s writer freely admits the film’s subtext:

“I started thinking about guys being unsure of their sexuality and thought that’s pretty scary.” “Freddy appeals to that gay part; he appeals to the questions Jesse is asking himself.” (David Chaskin, 2010).

Troubled by Freddy’s nocturnal visits, Jesse begins to act erratically, and Revenge displays more outdated opinions on homosexuality via Jesse’s parents. Jesse’s mother (Hope Lange) is protective of him, showing great concern for his wellbeing and defending him against his disapproving father (Clu Gulager).

Freddy ignites homosexual feelings in Jesse that begin to reach fruition during the sequence at the pool party. As the young, heterosexual couples start to pair off, an anxious Jesse is escorted to the changing room by Lisa (Kim Myers), a female suitor. The reluctant Jesse declares, “I’m not into this”. Lisa insists she wants to help, but Jesse berates, “How can ‘you’ help?”, emphasising his feelings for her sexual inadequacy as a woman. Jesse is cajoled into a sexual encounter with Lisa, but Freddy intervenes, his tongue emerging from Jesse’s mouth and sending Jesse into a panic. Freddy symbolises Jesse’s homosexual nature, an evil that restrains his heterosexual feelings. Freddy releases Jesse’s homosexual urges, sending him running to Grady’s bedroom. Jesse’s sexual intentions are apparent as he throws himself upon Grady, demanding, “I need you to let me stay here”. Jesse confesses, “something is trying to get inside my body” and Grady replies, “yeah, and she’s female and you wanna sleep with me?” The ‘final girl’s’ conversion into the killer, as seen in  Chainsaw Massacre 2 and Halloween, becomes literal as Freddy bursts out from within Jesse’s body, impaling Grady against the door. Symbolising the unleashing of Jesse’s destructive homosexual urges, with the kill again substituting for homosexual intercourse. Like Norman, Jesse has a chance of redemption through heterosexual love. Lisa confronts Freddy; Jesse’s consciousness begs for death rather than becoming Freddy, but Lisa declares her love for Jesse and kisses Freddy. Lisa’s heterosexual love destroys Freddy’s malignant homosexual force, sending Jesse’s gay nature into remission, and a new heterosexual Jesse rises from the ashes of Freddy’s corpse.

Although Revenge follows all the conventions of the classic ‘Slasher’ film, bar the casting of the male lead, it is not well regarded by fans, being mockingly referred to as “the homo nightmare by a million pubescent boys” (Mark Patton, 2010). The cast and crew also acknowledge the film’s failings and cite the casting of a male in the role of the ‘final girl’ as responsible.

“When you suddenly cast your male lead in the victim role and then you have him scream like a girl for ninety minutes, you’re gonna have some people going ‘well, you know, that’s not the most manliest performance I’ve ever seen’.” (Producer, Joel Soisson, 2010).

To understand the failure of casting a male in the ‘final girl’ role, it is vital to consider audience expectations when viewing ‘Slasher’ films. Films that are used as a form of romantic courtship by millions of young, heterosexual couples.

“Teenage boys enjoyed a horror film significantly more when they were sitting next to a female companion who expressed fright, whereas teenage girls enjoyed the film more when the male companion with whom they were paired showed a sense of mastery and control.” (Zillmann, et al., 1986, P.586).

Accepting this, to directly depict a male protagonist having his sexuality put into question and his control threatened, would work contrary to the popular appeal of the films. Therefore, it becomes clear why although the ‘final girl’s’ identity remains male, she must physically become female.

Bibliography

Books

Bershoff, H., 1997. Monsters in the Closet: Homosexuality and the Horror Film. Manchester; Manchester University Press.

Bieber, I., Dain, H.J., Dince, P.R., Drellich, M.G., Grand, H.G., Gundlach, R.R., Kremer, M.W., Rifkin, A.H., Wilbur, C.B. and Bieber, T.B., 1962. Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals. New York; Basic Books.

Clover, C.J., 1992. Men., Woman and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film. Princeton, New Jersey; Princeton University Press.

Lewes, K., 1989. The Psychoanalytic Theory of Male Homosexuality. New York; Plume.

Perrault, C., 1697. Fairy Tales from Past Times with Morals. Paris: Publisher Unknown.

Zillmann, D., Weaver, J. B., Mundorf, N., and Aust, C. F., 1986. Effects of an opposite-gender companion’s affect to horror on distress, delight, and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. [Journal Article] 3(51), 586. Available through Zotero Website < https://www.zotero.org/mbeam/items/itemKey/BDRMT58F >. [Accessed 15 March 2013]

DVD Extras

Interview with director Tobe Hooper, 2008. [DVD Extra] USA: Dark Sky Films

Interview with writer Kim Henkel, 2008.  [DVD Extra] USA: Dark Sky Films

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, 2008. [DVD Commentary] Tobe Hooper. USA: Dark Sky Films

Films

A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge, 1985. [Film] Directed by Jack Sholder. USA: New Line Cinema

Boys Beware, 1961. [Film] Directed by Sid Davis. USA: Sid Davis Productions

The Bride of Frankenstein, 1934. [Film] Directed by James Whale. USA: Universal

Dressed to Kill, 1980. [Film] Directed by Brian De Palma. USA: Cinema 77

Flesh Wounds, 2006. [Documentary] Directed by Michael Felsher. USA: Dark Sky Films

Friday the 13th, Part 2, 1980. [Film] Directed by Steve Miner. USA: Paramount

Halloween, 1978. [Film] Directed by John Carpenter. USA: Compass International

Never Sleep Again, 2010. [Documentary] Directed by Daniel Farrands & Andrew Kasch. USA: 1428 Films

Psycho, 1960. [Film] Directed by Alfred Hitchcock. USA: Paramount

Rope, 1948. [Film] Directed by Alfred Hitchcock. USA: Warner Brothers

The Silence of the Lambs, 1991. [Film] Directed by Jonathan Demme. USA: Orion

Sleepaway Camp, 1983. [Film] Directed by Robert Hiltzik. USA: American Eagle Films

Strangers on a Train, 1951. [Film] Directed by Alfred Hitchcock. USA: Warner Brothers

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, 1974. [Film] Directed by Tobe Hooper. USA: Bryanston Films

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2, 1986. [Film] Directed by Tobe Hooper. USA: Cannon Group

Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation, 1995. [Film] Directed by Kim Henkel. USA: Return Productions

Online Newspaper Articles  

Maher, K. 2010. Psycho: The Impact Made by Alfred Hitchcock’s Classic Movie. The Times [Online] March 26. Available at: www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/arts/film/article2467719.ece

Webpages  

Kelly, A.S., 2010. Mother Issues. [Online]. Available at: www.screenjabber.com/psycho-50th-importance [Accessed on 15.03.2013]

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s